<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Top 10 Reasons Why We Don’t Invest in Canada	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://edrempel.com/top-10-reasons-why-we-dont-invest-in-canada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://edrempel.com/top-10-reasons-why-we-dont-invest-in-canada/</link>
	<description>Insights From Experience on Building Financially Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2025 21:15:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kathryn		</title>
		<link>https://edrempel.com/top-10-reasons-why-we-dont-invest-in-canada/#comment-46120</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kathryn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2025 21:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://edrempel.com/?p=4520#comment-46120</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is an incredibly thorough and thought-provoking breakdown of why global and U.S. investing may offer stronger long-term potential than a Canada-centric approach. Your analysis is bold, well-researched, and refreshingly honest—especially in challenging common assumptions like home country bias and the perceived safety of familiar companies. I really appreciate how you’ve laid out the data behind growth disparities, sector concentration, and the evolving role of fixed income and dividends. It’s clear you’ve put a lot of care into helping investors think critically and strategically. For anyone serious about building a resilient portfolio, this is essential reading. Great work, Ed!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an incredibly thorough and thought-provoking breakdown of why global and U.S. investing may offer stronger long-term potential than a Canada-centric approach. Your analysis is bold, well-researched, and refreshingly honest—especially in challenging common assumptions like home country bias and the perceived safety of familiar companies. I really appreciate how you’ve laid out the data behind growth disparities, sector concentration, and the evolving role of fixed income and dividends. It’s clear you’ve put a lot of care into helping investors think critically and strategically. For anyone serious about building a resilient portfolio, this is essential reading. Great work, Ed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ed Rempel		</title>
		<link>https://edrempel.com/top-10-reasons-why-we-dont-invest-in-canada/#comment-32770</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Rempel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2023 18:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://edrempel.com/?p=4520#comment-32770</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://edrempel.com/top-10-reasons-why-we-dont-invest-in-canada/#comment-32376&quot;&gt;Bogdan&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Bogdan,

Thanks for your comments. Glad to hear we agree on everything.

I can tell you why most mainstream &quot;experts&quot;recommend 60/40 or 70/30 portfolios for their clients but are 100% equities personally. It is because of compliance. Having to explain it to a compliance department and risking a complaint. The regulators&#039; rules heavily push advisors to investing in bonds to protect their careers. 

It could be more innocent in that they know they won&#039;t sell their own investments after a market crash, but clients might.

One of the most beneficial things an advisor can do is spend time educating clients about the stock market long-term to help them learn to have a higher risk tolerance. It&#039;s a massive benefit over the decades. If they did, they wouldn&#039;t have to stick their clients with underperforming balanced portfolios.

Ed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://edrempel.com/top-10-reasons-why-we-dont-invest-in-canada/#comment-32376">Bogdan</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Bogdan,</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments. Glad to hear we agree on everything.</p>
<p>I can tell you why most mainstream &#8220;experts&#8221;recommend 60/40 or 70/30 portfolios for their clients but are 100% equities personally. It is because of compliance. Having to explain it to a compliance department and risking a complaint. The regulators&#8217; rules heavily push advisors to investing in bonds to protect their careers. </p>
<p>It could be more innocent in that they know they won&#8217;t sell their own investments after a market crash, but clients might.</p>
<p>One of the most beneficial things an advisor can do is spend time educating clients about the stock market long-term to help them learn to have a higher risk tolerance. It&#8217;s a massive benefit over the decades. If they did, they wouldn&#8217;t have to stick their clients with underperforming balanced portfolios.</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bogdan		</title>
		<link>https://edrempel.com/top-10-reasons-why-we-dont-invest-in-canada/#comment-32376</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bogdan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 22:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://edrempel.com/?p=4520#comment-32376</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Since I created my very first comment, a follow up I have hard time to resist. 
Regarding bonds, a funny fact:
The mainstream experts for retirement investing preach the 60/40, 70/30 sure, whatever; including from some very respectable investment organizations. 
This year as I recall at least two such experts (which in general I respect) from Morning star. They admitted that they don&#039;t follow what they preach e.g. they don&#039;t do bonds allocations for their personal retirement investments. I was shocked by their honesty. They did not provide reasonable explanation why they did not follow their preaching (like they were kind of saying they&#039;re are too busy?).  
Well, they should stop minding their corporate careers, and instead open their own shop to keep their moral integrity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since I created my very first comment, a follow up I have hard time to resist.<br />
Regarding bonds, a funny fact:<br />
The mainstream experts for retirement investing preach the 60/40, 70/30 sure, whatever; including from some very respectable investment organizations.<br />
This year as I recall at least two such experts (which in general I respect) from Morning star. They admitted that they don&#8217;t follow what they preach e.g. they don&#8217;t do bonds allocations for their personal retirement investments. I was shocked by their honesty. They did not provide reasonable explanation why they did not follow their preaching (like they were kind of saying they&#8217;re are too busy?).<br />
Well, they should stop minding their corporate careers, and instead open their own shop to keep their moral integrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bogdan		</title>
		<link>https://edrempel.com/top-10-reasons-why-we-dont-invest-in-canada/#comment-32375</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bogdan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 22:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://edrempel.com/?p=4520#comment-32375</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Ed, lurking here for some time and your ideas (no bonds, US market only, long term index/ETF holding, low cost, growth preference, avoid income investing, thinking taxes, etc),  are also &quot;my way&quot; of DIY investing since the start of it. Before I found your side :).

Excellent advise, if only more Canadians follow it... Instead, majority do the &quot;my banker did my risk assessment; no idea how much costs, not free?&quot; :)

Couple of more reasons for USA investing:
- diversification, since living and working in Canada, investments (all) in US avoids all bets on Canada.   
- currencies: lowers beta for investments. When bad times, US dolar is stronger, making CAD balance not as bad in bad times. I prefer not hedged ETF.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ed, lurking here for some time and your ideas (no bonds, US market only, long term index/ETF holding, low cost, growth preference, avoid income investing, thinking taxes, etc),  are also &#8220;my way&#8221; of DIY investing since the start of it. Before I found your side :).</p>
<p>Excellent advise, if only more Canadians follow it&#8230; Instead, majority do the &#8220;my banker did my risk assessment; no idea how much costs, not free?&#8221; 🙂</p>
<p>Couple of more reasons for USA investing:<br />
&#8211; diversification, since living and working in Canada, investments (all) in US avoids all bets on Canada.<br />
&#8211; currencies: lowers beta for investments. When bad times, US dolar is stronger, making CAD balance not as bad in bad times. I prefer not hedged ETF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Object Caching 41/64 objects using Disk
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Minified using Disk

Served from: edrempel.com @ 2026-05-08 16:41:00 by W3 Total Cache
-->